Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

Charlotte A. van der Velden; M.C. van der Steen; Jens Leenders; Florens Q.M.P. van Douveren; Rob P.A. Janssen; Max Reijman

doi:10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

Charlotte A. van der Velden
, M.C. van der Steen
, Jens Leenders
, Florens Q.M.P. van Douveren
, Rob P.A. Janssen
, Max Reijman

Máxima Medical Center
Catharina Ziekenhuis

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschrift › Artikel › Wetenschappelijk › peer review

Samenvatting

Background: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice.

Methods: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria.

Results: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses).

Conclusions: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

Originele taal	Engels
Artikelnummer	240
Aantal pagina's	8
Tijdschrift	BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume	20
Nummer van het tijdschrift	1
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6
Status	Gepubliceerd - 22 mei 2019

Trefwoorden

activities of daily living
adolescent
arthralgia diagnosis
child
female
follow-up studies
humans
injury severity score
knee injuries complications
knee joint
male
Netherlands
pain measurement methods
pilot projects
psychometrics
reproducibility of results
surveys and questionnaires
translations

Toegang tot document

10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-childDefinitieve gepubliceerde versie, 387 KB

Citeer dit

@article{3b18d11429674f44838b899051f76fd0,

title = "Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child: which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?",

abstract = "Background: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice. Methods: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Results: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75\% relevant), adequate construct validity (75\% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75\% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75\% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75\% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40\% confirmed hypotheses). Conclusions: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.",

keywords = "activities of daily living, adolescent, arthralgia diagnosis, child, female, follow-up studies, humans, injury severity score, knee injuries complications, knee joint, male, Netherlands, pain measurement methods, pilot projects, psychometrics, reproducibility of results, surveys and questionnaires, translations",

author = "\{van der Velden\}, \{Charlotte A.\} and \{van der Steen\}, M.C. and Jens Leenders and \{van Douveren\}, \{Florens Q.M.P.\} and Janssen, \{Rob P.A.\} and Max Reijman",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "22",

doi = "10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",

issn = "1471-2474",

publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedi-IKDC or KOOS-child

T2 - which questionnaire should be used in children with knee disorders?

AU - van der Velden, Charlotte A.

AU - van der Steen, M.C.

AU - Leenders, Jens

AU - van Douveren, Florens Q.M.P.

AU - Janssen, Rob P.A.

AU - Reijman, Max

PY - 2019/5/22

Y1 - 2019/5/22

N2 - Background: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice. Methods: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Results: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses). Conclusions: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

AB - Background: The Pedi International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) child are validated questionnaires for children with knee disorders. The aim of this study was to translate these questionnaires in Dutch and to recommend which questionnaires should - based on their psychometric properties - be used in clinical practice. Methods: The English Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child were translated by the forward-backward procedure. Subsequently, content validity of the Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child was evaluated by both patients (n = 18) and experts (n = 18). To evaluate construct validity and interpretability participants with knee disorders (n = 100) completed the Numeric Rating Scale Pain, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, EuroQol-5 Dimension, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-Child at baseline. Participants completed the anchor question, Pedi-IKDC and KOOS-child two weeks (n = 54) and one year (n = 71) after baseline, for evaluating the test-retest reliability and responsiveness. Psychometric properties were interpreted following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) criteria. Results: The Pedi-IKDC showed adequate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.9; standard error of measurement (SEM) 8.6; smallest detectable change (SDC) 23.8), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor or ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95) and adequate responsiveness (> 75% confirmed hypotheses). The KOOS-Child showed an adequate test-retest reliability (ICC 0.8-0.9; SEM 8.9-16.9; SDC 24.7-46.9), adequate content validity (> 75% relevant, except KOOS-Child subscale ADL), adequate construct validity (75% confirmed hypotheses), low floor and ceiling effects (scores between 5 and 95, except KOOS-Child subscale activities of daily living and Sport/play) and moderate responsiveness (40% confirmed hypotheses). Conclusions: The Pedi IKDC showed better psychometric properties than the KOOS-Child and should therefore be used in children with knee disorders.

KW - activities of daily living

KW - adolescent

KW - arthralgia diagnosis

KW - child

KW - female

KW - follow-up studies

KW - humans

KW - injury severity score

KW - knee injuries complications

KW - knee joint

KW - male

KW - Netherlands

KW - pain measurement methods

KW - pilot projects

KW - psychometrics

KW - reproducibility of results

KW - surveys and questionnaires

KW - translations

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

DO - 10.1186/s12891-019-2600-6

M3 - Article

SN - 1471-2474

VL - 20

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

IS - 1

M1 - 240

ER -